(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA173142000; Sun, 28 May 1995 13:13:20 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from tom.compulink.co.uk by webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA173071994; Sun, 28 May 1995 13:13:14 -0700
Received: from gonzales.compulink.co.uk (gonzales.compulink.co.uk [192.188.69.4]) by tom.compulink.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) id VAA05007 for lightwave@webcom.com; Sun, 28 May 1995 21:16:22 +0100
Date: Sun, 28 May 95 21:16 BST-1
From: garygfx@cix.compulink.co.uk (Gary Fenton)
Subject: Re[2]: CyberStorm 060
To: lightwave@webcom.com
Reply-To: garygfx@cix.compulink.co.uk
Message-Id: <memo.590235@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Manuel DeSantos <manueld@pinn.net> wrote:
>I thought the Warp Engine 040 40mhz was about 3-4 times faster than a stock
>040 Amiga 4000? This Cyberstorm card can't be only 4 times faster, that
40Mhz 040 accelerators like the CyberStorm and Warp are 3 times faster for
rendering in Lightwave - certainly not 4 times faster than a 4000/040/25.
Gary F.
--
garygfx@cix.compulink.co.uk (Gary Fenton) sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com